Wednesday, June 02, 2010
Another Dancing Bird
This bird dances even better than the other, and the song's a lot better:
Tuesday, June 01, 2010
The Neuroscience of Music
Here's an interview with Aniruddh D. Patel who gives some insight into how the study of music and the mind has become a legitimate science. He talks of Snowball the dancing bird and suggests maybe dolphins and chimps can boogie, too.
Video below of Snowball:
Video below of Snowball:
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Hava Nagila
I can't resist learning "Hava Nagila" for an upcoming wedding we're playing. So I've been doing my homework online and found these two videos. The first is a Beatles tribute/parody and the second is Dick Dale. Enjoy!
Neil Young Clips
Here's a blog entry with three vids of songs from recent Neil Young shows. The author makes some interesting comparisons between Neil's shows and Bob Dylan's shows these days.
Thursday, May 27, 2010
The Bad Sleep Well
I did a google search this afternoon to get some information for the CD I'll be releasing shortly. I wanted to find out how a small label like mine can pay royalties to songwriters and publishers for songs my band has recorded without being raped by companies like Harry Fox Agency, which wants me to pay up front for how many times I guess my album will be digitally downloaded this year plus a $15 fee per song on top of that.
So, for example, if I say I think I'll sell 50 downloads of the album x 10 songs written by other artists x 10 cents per song, that comes to $50 worth of royalties. Reasonable enough.
But then Harry Fox adds a $150 service fee (10 x $15), which seems odd to me. This company would earn 3 times as much as all the songwriters and publishers combined just for collecting and distributing the cash?
Looking for clues to a more equitable way to do this, I typed "royalty reporting for very small label" into the Google, and the very first entry that came up was this one written last December on the band Too Much Joy's blog titled My Hilarious Warner Bros. Royalty Statement.
The title of course, is sarcastic. The story is not funny. The article details some of the standard business practices of the big bad record companies and how they have routinely screwed the poor little musicians. Various aspects of this story have been documented and explained time and again, but I think the sheer brazenness on the human level of how this artist is treated by record company accountants is worth looking at.
And it gives me pause. Here I am worrying about paying ten cents per download to each artist that writes a song. If I sell 300 copies of my album, which I'm planning to distribute digitally for $3.99 a piece (for 16 songs) I expect I'll be overjoyed!
Yet the Warner Brothers accountant was crass enough to tell the pesky musician that a $10,000 accounting error (in the record company's favor, of course) was simply of no account. It happens all the time.
That kind of dinosaur thinking is doomed to fail. It's the kind of thinking that pumps oil from the bottom of the ocean with minimal safeguards, leading to disaster. But us little mammals can't be discouraged. We've got important woik to do!
So, for example, if I say I think I'll sell 50 downloads of the album x 10 songs written by other artists x 10 cents per song, that comes to $50 worth of royalties. Reasonable enough.
But then Harry Fox adds a $150 service fee (10 x $15), which seems odd to me. This company would earn 3 times as much as all the songwriters and publishers combined just for collecting and distributing the cash?
Looking for clues to a more equitable way to do this, I typed "royalty reporting for very small label" into the Google, and the very first entry that came up was this one written last December on the band Too Much Joy's blog titled My Hilarious Warner Bros. Royalty Statement.
The title of course, is sarcastic. The story is not funny. The article details some of the standard business practices of the big bad record companies and how they have routinely screwed the poor little musicians. Various aspects of this story have been documented and explained time and again, but I think the sheer brazenness on the human level of how this artist is treated by record company accountants is worth looking at.
And it gives me pause. Here I am worrying about paying ten cents per download to each artist that writes a song. If I sell 300 copies of my album, which I'm planning to distribute digitally for $3.99 a piece (for 16 songs) I expect I'll be overjoyed!
Yet the Warner Brothers accountant was crass enough to tell the pesky musician that a $10,000 accounting error (in the record company's favor, of course) was simply of no account. It happens all the time.
That kind of dinosaur thinking is doomed to fail. It's the kind of thinking that pumps oil from the bottom of the ocean with minimal safeguards, leading to disaster. But us little mammals can't be discouraged. We've got important woik to do!
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Sunday Link Dump
Happy Birthday to Wavy Gravy (short piece at The Grateful Blog).
A book I wasn't aware of about Doug Sahm.
Off the wall contributions by Tom Waits to Bob Dylan's Theme Time Radio Hour.
I found these links at ExpectingRain.com, a Dylan fan site, which often posts other music news of interest.
A book I wasn't aware of about Doug Sahm.
Off the wall contributions by Tom Waits to Bob Dylan's Theme Time Radio Hour.
I found these links at ExpectingRain.com, a Dylan fan site, which often posts other music news of interest.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Lo Fi Revolution
Lincoln Spector of PC World did a quick and dirty study that indicates people (including music pros) can barely tell the difference between uncompressed and compressed audio files.
Curiously enough, the author mentions another more scientific study, which indicates that young people coming up with MP3s as the primary format actually prefer it:
Not unlike the preference for the warmth and crackle of vinyl, eh?
Here's the full article.
Curiously enough, the author mentions another more scientific study, which indicates that young people coming up with MP3s as the primary format actually prefer it:
[T]he students he tested like the "sizzle" or metallic sound that the format imparts.
Not unlike the preference for the warmth and crackle of vinyl, eh?
Here's the full article.
Sunday, May 09, 2010
Test Blog
I've moved the blog, but I want to see if traffic is also being redirected automatically.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
This blog has moved
This blog is now located at http://blog.radiofreeearth.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.
For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://blog.radiofreeearth.com/feeds/posts/default.
Monday, October 05, 2009
Expanding Musical Taste
Bob Dylan's got a Christmas album coming out, as many know already. Here's a piece that suggests his record may have been influenced by a 1991 Brave Combo Christmas album. Dylan covers a song that Brave Combo did there, the polka "Must Be Santa." According to this piece, Dylan once played that song on his XM radio showing, commenting about Brave Combo, “They say their mission is to expand the musical taste of their listeners. We have the same mission here on TTRH.” I note it because that's part of the mission here at Radio Free Earth, too.
Tuesday, September 01, 2009
New Times Require New Economy
Here's an interesting piece, which challenges the idea (or high religion) of the growth economy, always expanding, growing fatter and fatter. Some economists seem to be working on a new model, based on cellular growth, in an effort to dream up a sustainable model of economic activity. Read this from the Harvard Business Review's blog.
Sunday, August 23, 2009
RFE Podcast #17
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
A Photo from Musikfest

Here's a photo from the Morning Call's blog from our Musikfest performance last weekend:
Permalink here.
Tuesday, July 07, 2009
Priced to Sell: Malcolm Gladwell talks about "Free"
Malcolm Gladwell takes aim at a new book by Chris Anderson called "Free: The Future of a Radical Price" in this week's The New Yorker magazine. Get it while it's free.
Gladwell refutes Anderson's assertion that "information wants to be free" -- "Amazon want information ... to be free, because that way Amazon makes more money. Why are the self-interested motives of powerful companies being elevated to a philosophical principle?"
Gladwell refutes Anderson's assertion that "information wants to be free" -- "Amazon want information ... to be free, because that way Amazon makes more money. Why are the self-interested motives of powerful companies being elevated to a philosophical principle?"
Monday, July 06, 2009
Podcast #16
Archives
- June 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
